Of Dan Brown,Gilbert and Shoddy Writing
The precursor : A lot of people find Dan Brown and Elizabeth Gilbert's writing to be shoddy. I am guilty of committing the same crime. However, if a contradictory and sometimes obscure thought is 'out there', such overwhelming success is welcome.
Salman Rushdie gave this piece of advice to Irshad Manji over the flak she received for her book : 'Your work is out there. It will create magic for some and it will stir a hornet's nest. As a writer you must know that you cant control your work when its published. After that your thoughts and your work take a life of its own.'
Jessica Crispin wrote this article in defense of Elizabeth Gilbert's books. My favourite lines :
"Like a lot of people who care about books and writing and sentence structure, I was initially horrified at the success at Dan Brown's The Da Vinci Code. Then I realized what it meant: 80 million people read a book about the removal of femininity from the Catholic Church, about how Jesus liked women and prostitutes and screw-ups and freaks, about how the Bible was edited by men in power, about how Jesus' divinity was not universally accepted. They read the book, and now it's in their brains, like a vaccination against patriarchal monotheism, even if they don't do anything with the information. Even if the people who read Elizabeth Gilbert's books now only toss them away and grumble ''How dare she?,'' Gilbert's sincerity about figuring out a new way to be in the world are now out there. It won't rid the world of its Lori Gottliebs, the fearmongers and the scolds, but the books can create little antibodies in the culture, boosting our immune system against them. "
