If you are an avid TV watcher you will know that one of the Indian channels is airing a serial called 'Balika Vadhu'. This serial is ostensibly about child marriage and focuses on evils of society in the rural pockets of India. A couple of days back, the child star protagonist of this serial was being interviewed by a news channel(obviously they have no valuable news to air). The child star answered questions like a pro. To a point where her age and her 'maturity' was irritating.
There is a lot of valid debate about child stars being likened to child labour. Just like a family of six with an alcoholic father and a maid for a mother sends their eldest son to work as a waiter, a child star with a cute face and passable acting skills gets a chance at 'exposure' and a life filled with comfort.
There are a lot of problems inherent here. Can parents who live a comfortable life give their child the TV exposure for an extra buck? How different is the parent that sends their child to work in a dinghy restaurant versus a parent who gets a child on TV just to make them a star? Who draws a line? Is a line required?
(I don't want to belong to the school of thought that says a child that works early loses on maturity or the innocence of childhood. But is there a need for awareness here? )
My problem with this entire debate is slightly different. Traditionally as a society have been of the assumption that kids should study and then be employed. Post employment they MUST live with their parents. Which means, unlike the parents of the West that send their kids to college at the age of 16 and expect them to fend for themselves, our parents keep us in the nest till we are 25 years old. So we might scoff at the thought that our child will be 'working' (Why should you work at 16? your dad is still earning!) at 16. We are also appalled at the 'western' concept of leaving the house and living on your own after a certain age. Now compare the situation of earning at 16 with that of being a child star at 8. My question is : You wont allow you child to earn money to fend for themselves at the age of 16, but you will let them take a go at stardom and a large pot of money at the age of 8? Is this about age, freedom or compensation?
Are we all about ' show me the moolah' all the time?